|
TO BECOME A SUBSCRIBER CLICK
HERE
THE HUNLEY
.com
The Most Up to Date Free Information Site on the
WEB
For Non-Profit Educational and Research Purposes.
PRESENTS
FOR
SUBSCRIBERS

by George W. Penington - Editor
MAY, 2005
ISSUE #58
Contents:
1) WELCOME TO THE NEW HUNLEY NEWSLETTER
>
2)
Special
On Conrad Chapman Print
3) Five More
Hunley type subs
?
4) FIVE CONFEDERATE SUBMARINES AT
BUILT AT SHREVEPORT
5) FACTS ABOUT THE RED RIVER CAMPAIGN
6)
Hunley Parts on EBay causing a National Stir
7) E. Lee SPENCE STILL IN SUIT over status as Hunley finder
8) Interesting Book From The Law Book Exchange
9) HUNLEY MODEL FROM A SUBSCRIBER
10) How did the Hunley's
ballast tanks work and how did she submerge?
11) Michael Crisafulli
ANSWERS
12) THE BATTLE OF
SECESSIONVILLE - BOONE HALL
13) E-MAIL AND GUEST
BOOK SELECTIONS
14) What were people
searching for this month:
15)TO CANCEL RECEIVING THIS NEWSLETTER
1)
WELCOME TO THE NEW HUNLEY NEWSLETTER
A
special welcome to
all the new subscribers. This newsletter IS published
once a month with a
link
to the online addition available to subscribers only.
ALL
issues are dedicated not only to the brave
and
honorable Men of the Hunley,
but to the Subscribers
and
Contributors to each issue, particularly to
the
CSS H L HUNLEY CLUB.
This is my tenth year of running the Hunley.com website as a
free service to all those that played a part in making this happen.
George W. Penington
2)
Special On Conrad Chapman Print
Hunley Print
Framed :
Special Price: 199.99 plus S&H ( Product # 1050)
Framed print of Conrad Wise
Chapman's painting of the Confederate Submarine Hunley. The print
is framed in 1and1/2 inch mahogany, and is double matted . The print
measures 22" wide by 28" long framed.
Item Name: Framed Conrad print Item Number: 1050 Price:
$199.99 
THIS IS THE

|
top
3) Five More
Hunley type subs
realname: Henry Albers username:
hjalbers@uno.edu city: Mandeville
state: LA. Date: Tuesday May 31, 2005
comments I was surprised that you left out the
Singer Submarine Company in Shreveport, LA. in your list of places where Confederate
Submarines were built. They built five of the Hunley type subs before the war's end. Four of them were scuttled in the
Red River to prevent their capture by the Union.
top
4) FIVE CONFEDERATE SUBMARINES AT
BUILT AT SHREVEPORT

By Eric J. Brock
Originally published in The Forum,
January 26, 2005.
Copyright by Eric J. Brock
and Venture Publishing 2005
Reproduced by permission.
Until the discovery of the wreckage of the CSS Hunley and the recent ceremonies in Charleston, S.C., surrounding the reburial of its captain, George Dixon, and crew, it was not well known that experiments with submarines as weapons of war were made by both the Union and Confederate Navies during the Civil War.
Until I first wrote about the subject several years ago in my column for the now-defunct Shreveport Journal it was even less well-known that
five submarines were built at Shreveport's Confederate Naval Yard by the Singer Submarine Company
under contract with the Confederate Navy. That story was one of my most popular columns ever. Even now I am being asked about the subs in Red River. So here, again, is the tale of the Shreveport Confederate submarines, brought up to date.
MORE...
|
Dr. Gary D. Joiner holds a model of one of the Shreveport-built Confederate submarines. The model was constructed by naval historian William Atteridge of Arcadia, Louisiana.
|
First some background: the Singer Submarine Company was the creation of one Edgar C. Singer of San Antonio, Texas. Singer was a mechanical engineer and together with a group of artillerists and engineers, established a concern to build contact mines. Singer's mines came to be the most widely used in the Confederacy and the torpedoes Singer's firm built were widely used as well.
Three noted New Orleans inventors, Horace Hunley (for whom the ill-fated Charleston sub was named), James McClintock, and Baxter Watson joined with Singer in 1863. The three Louisianans had successfully built three submarines for the Confederacy already, namely the Pioneer, the Pioneer II, and the aforementioned Hunley. On February 17, 1864 the U.S.S. Housatonic, a Union sloop of war, became the first ship in American history to be sunk by a submarine when the Hunley attacked and destroyed her in the waters off Charleston. Unfortunately, for reasons still undetermined, the Hunley vanished after her successful attack (the first by a sub on an enemy craft in the history of the world) and was lost until the 1990s.
After that Confederate submarine operations took place in other locales, such as Mobile Bay, Alabama, and Norfolk, Virginia. Although their numbers were few, fewer even than Union experimental submarines then being created, they nevertheless struck a chord of fear in the North where the widely circulated newspaper Harper's Weekly dubbed them "Rebel infernal machines."
In any case, the Singer Submarine Company proved successful and was engaged by the Confederate Navy to build several of its underwater vessels at the Naval Yard in Shreveport. Several members of Singer's submarine corps came to Shreveport in September, 1863 to begin their work.
|
The site of the Confederate Naval Yard on Cross Bayou in 1902. Thirty-seven years earlier five experimental submarines were built here for the Confederate Navy. In 1902 many of the original Naval Yard buildings were still standing and can be seen in this photograph.
The Confederate shipyard
stood at the fork of Spring and North Market Streets on Cross Bayou. The shipyard built five submarines to protect the Red
River. These were similar to the Confederate submarine H. L. Hunley,
which had been by engineers of the Singer Submarine Corporation and was the
first submarine to sink a ship during wartime. One of the submarines was
dismantled and sent to Houston, Texas, but the other four remained in
Shreveport. These submarines were never used, but wartime naval orders show that
they were not unknown to the Union navy.
http://www.caddohistory.org/
*************************
|
NEWS RELEASE
|
|
Author Pens Book About Red River Campaign,
Second Book Responds to Demand
Military historian Gary Joiner of Shreveport has announced the
publication of two books, each related to the Red River Campaign of the U.S.
Civil War. One Damn Blunder from Beginning to End is a new analysis
of the campaign. This books represents more than five years of intensive
research and adds to body of knowledge about the last decisive Confederate
victory of the Civil War. The second, The Red River Campaign: Union and
Confederate Leadership and the War in Louisiana includes essays related
to the campaign and is edited by Joiner along with Theodore P. Savas and
David A. Woodbury. Each has received scholarly acclaim by Civil War
historians.
Joiner, a member of the faculty of the Department of History and Social
Sciences at LSU in Shreveport, became interested in the Battle of Mansfield
and the Red River Campaign when he did research jointly with the late Dr.
Eddie Vetter at Centenary College. Ad article they authored together is
included in the book of essays. He also visited the Mansfield Battlefield
shortly after moving to Shreveport and marrying his wife, Marilyn, who grew
up in that town.
One Damn Blunder takes its name from a quote by General William
Tecumseh Sherman who described the campaign in that manner. Although the
Battle of Mansfield was a decisive victory for Confederate forces, it has
been largely ignored by historians. “The victors write the history,” Joiner
said, explaining the reason for the neglect of this part of American
history. “The campaign included northern and southern troops, even troops of
the black Corps de Afrique,” he said. “This is part of the American
experience.”
The Red River Campaign was originally published as an edition of
a journal, Civil War Regiments. Due to demand for the journal, it
has been republished with additions by Parabellum Press, a publishing
company organized by Joiner to publish work of locally historical
significance. The original journal has been updated to include a foreword by
preeminent civil war historian Ed Bearss, historian emeritus of the National
Park Service, and a driving tour essay penned by Joiner. It includes essays
on two colonels of local note, James Beard and Henry Gray. |
http://parabellumpress.com/
publications.asp |
One Damn Blunder from Beginning to End: the Red River
Campaign of 1864
Gary Dillard Joiner, Scholarly Resources, Wilmington, DE, 2002, 198
pages,
Dillard Joiner's One Damn Blunder from Beginning to End, put a fresh face
on this little-known campaign. Joiner writes without the much-overused hype
of modern Civil War writers--claiming that every battle was decisive. Joiner
provides Civil War historians and military professionals a straightforward,
valuable account of the Red River Campaign. Joiner's maps, although lacking
in detail, are a great improvement over previous maps.
Joiner's new revelations about the Red River Campaign put a
different perspective on the causes of key events. For example, he
posits that the Confederates made a successful attempt to divert
water from the Red River through Tone's Bayou into Bayou Pierre.
And, although Admiral David D. Porter's problems have been thought
to be the result of low rainfall, Joiner convincingly argues that
the fleet's problems were due as much to deliberate efforts on the
part of Southern engineers to hamper the U.S. Navy's operations as
on the lack of rain.
Four Hunley-like submarines were being
constructed in Shreveport and perhaps four or five small
Arkansas-like ironclads were there as well. After discussing
Porter's naval experience and efforts to monitor the depth of the
river, Joiner explains that the admiral's fear of the Confederate
ships prompted him to lead the fleet upriver toward Shreveport
with the U.S.S. Eastport, the largest ironclad in the fleet, as
the flagship. Porter eventually lost the ironclad, not to enemy
warships, but to the difficulties of navigating the Red River.
Porter's decision hampered the Navy's efforts and almost led to a
substantial loss to the fleet.
One Damn Blunder from Beginning to End is useful to military
professionals as a modern overview of the Red River Campaign and
is especially useful for its analysis of personalities in joint
operations; its studies of military objectives clouded by
political and other nonmilitary concerns; the dynamics of
integrating units used to various operating procedures; and the
study of military engineering in terms of ad-hoc solutions to
military problems. I strongly recommend the book to serious
students of the Civil War.
LTC Steven E. Clay, USA, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas
|
Gary D. Joiner
Gary Joiner is a member of
the faculty of the Department of History and Social Sciences
at Louisiana State University in Shreveport. He also serves
as director of the Red River Regional Studies Center at the
university. In addition to his academic duties, he is owner
of a professional cartography firm that provides
governmental mapping and historical consultation to
governmental agencies. His community service activities have
included the local board of directors of the U.S. Civil War
Center at LSU in Baton Rouge and the presidency of the Civil
War Roundtable of North Louisiana. He has edited the journal
of the North Louisiana Historical Association and has served
as president of the DeSoto Parish Historical Society. Joiner
has provided maps for numerous scholarly publications and
has developed geographic information systems (GIS) for civil
war projects, including the mapping of Vicksburg National
Military Park and mapping projects for the Civil War
Preservation Trust. He is a regional expert on historical
and archaeological matters and has served as a consultant
for regional television projects covering the history of the
Red River and the Red River campaign. He has also appeared
as a panelist/expert on MSNBC. Joiner is a popular speaker
on military history issues for Civil War forums and study
groups. He and his wife are founders of the Friends of the
Mansfield Battlefield, a nonprofit organization dedicated to
preservation of battle sites of the Red River Campaign.
|
|
|
The Naval Yard was located on the southern bank of Cross Bayou where it meets the Red River. The Clyde Fant Parkway now crosses part of the site, which lies immediately north of the Harrah's Casino and hotel complex and stretches back along Cross Bayou to near Spring Street. In 1863 this was a bustling industrial area with foundries, machine shops and smithies. Nearby, a fairly short distance to the west, was the arsenal and magazine of the Trans-Mississippi Department of the Confederate Army. It was at the Shreveport Naval Yard that two of the Confederacy's famous ironclad warships were created: the Webb and the Missouri.
Five submarines are known to have been built at Shreveport. Four never left town but the other was sent to Houston, Texas, though its fate afterward is unknown. As the rest of the Confederacy fell piece by piece, the Trans-Mississippi Department, headquartered at Shreveport (also then the state capital), determined to fight on to the bitter end and, it was hoped, to full independence from the Union. The Shreveport-built submarines were designed by James Jones, a Singer engineer who also was part of the inaugural crew of the Hunley. They were intended to play crucial roles in the destruction of Federal ships on the Red River and elsewhere but the war ended before they had the chance.
A Union intelligence report of March 13, 1865 describing one of the Shreveport-built submarines survives. It reads:
The boat is 40 feet long, 48 inches deep, and 40 inches wide, built entirely of iron, and shaped similar to a steam boiler. The ends are sharp pointed. On the sides are two iron flanges (called fins), for the purpose of raising or lowering the boat in the water. The boat is propelled at the rate of four miles per hour by means of a crank, worked by two men. The Wheel is on the propeller principle.
The boat is usually worked seven feet under water and has four dead lights for the purpose of steering or taking observations. Each boat carries two torpedoes, one at the bow, attached to a pole 20 feet long; one on the stern, fastened to a plank 10 or 12 feet long. The explosion of the missile on the bow is caused by coming in contact with the object intended to be destroyed. The one on the stern, on the plank, is intended to explode when the plank strikes the vessel.
The air arrangements are so constructed as to retain sufficient air for four men at work and four idle, two or three hours. The torpedoes are made of sheet iron 3/16 of an inch thick, and contain 40 pounds of powder. The shape is something after the pattern of a wooden churn, and about 28 inches long.
In June, 1865, the Trans-Mississippi Confederacy surrendered. Shortly thereafter a Federal naval force was sent up the Red River to demand the surrender of the Missouri (the Webb had been captured previously while trying to run the blockade at New Orleans, disguised as a federal gunboat). To prevent them falling into enemy hands along with the Missouri, the builders of the four submarines sank them in the muddy waters about where Cross Bayou and the Red River meet. There they remain, buried in the river's mud and silt, to this very day.
Thus far, attempts to find and unearth the subs have been unsuccessful. Initially some of the casinos were approached about funding an archaeological dig for the craft on their sites but expressed little interest. However, in 2000 and 2001 two thoroughgoing efforts were made to locate the subs. One was a side-scan sonar survey of the river’s banks near Cross Bayou and opposite its mouth. Author Clive Cussler funded the effort which was conducted by marine sonar expert Ralph Wilbanks and local history professor and cartographer Gary Joiner.
The second effort was part of a larger environmental and historical impact survey required by law prior to the start of work on the Louisiana Boardwalk Mall in Bossier City. Pan American Consulting of Memphis, together with Dr. Joiner of Shreveport, conducted this survey.
Based upon known facts regarding the disposal of the subs (which the Confederate Navy intended to raise again one day but obviously never did) and the patterns of the Red River’s shifting in the decades since, it is probable that the submarines now rest on the east bank of the river, well inland from the river itself. In other words, they are likely buried in the earth; high and dry (dry anyway) today.
Lots of magnetic debris was picked up by the sonar surveys including a 19th century locomotive engine, steamboat boilers, steamboat funnels, parts of steamboat sternwheels, and other river wreckage-related items, most of which remain buried.
The most intriguing find was a large metal object, or rather group of objects, found to be about 30 feet deep and several hundred feet inland from the river on the Bossier side, just north of the Bass Pro Shop site on the publicly owned tract erroneously called “Cane’s Landing.” The signals given off by this material during sonar surveys indicate that it is the right size, shape, and density to be the four subs lashed together. Unfortunately, costs and red tape have thus far prevented further exploration of the site but it is highly likely that the submarines are there.
Wherever the subs are they are there for the long-haul as it is highly unlikely they will be unearthed in the near-future. Entombed as they have been for almost 140 years, however, it is doubtful that a few more years’ time will make a great deal of difference to their condition when ultimately they are unearthed as hopefully they will one day be. There seems little doubt that when that day comes it will rank as one of the most important finds in Civil War maritime archaeology, nearly equal to the discovery and resurrection of the Hunley in significance.

http://www.shreveyacht.com/
top
|
5) FACTS ABOUT THE RED RIVER CAMPAIGN
What made the Red River Campaign unique?
-
The Battle of Mansfield was the last major Confederate victory
of the Civil War.
-
The highest-ranking Confederate officer to fall was Brig. Gen.
Tom Green, a hero of San Jacinto and the leader of the Confederate
cavalry. He died while commanding troops in what was perhaps the
most unique battle of the war – over two thousand cavalry against
an ironclad monitor, a wooden-clad gunboat, and a troop transport.
-
This battle, Blair’s Landing, saw the first use of a periscope
in battle.
-
The Union fleet was saved by an ingenious series of dams at
Alexandria. The dams allowed the river to rise and the Union
gunboats to flee to safety. The engineer who designed the dams,
Col. Joseph Bailey of Wisconsin, was awarded the Medal of Honor
for his feat.
-
The Confederates forced the Red River’s water to almost dry up
by creating a dam south of Shreveport which diverted the flow into
a parallel stream while allowing water to remain at navigable
depths in Shreveport.
-
The Confederates built an ironclad for river defense in
Shreveport. The C.S.S. Missouri laid mines that sank the
Eastport, the largest gunboat in the U.S. naval force.
-
The Confederates also built five submarines in Shreveport.
They were sisters of the C.S.S. Hunley, built by the same
engineers. The submarines were 40 feet in length, 40 inches wide
and 48 inches in depth. They had a nine man crew. Although ready
to defend Shreveport, they were not used in the campaign and were
unknown until recently. Four of the five are believed to be in
Shreveport waters or underground in the former channel. The fifth
was dismantled and sent to Houston, never to be heard from again.
http://parabellumpress.com/publications.asp
|
top
6) Hunley Parts on EBay causing a National Stir
|
Four pieces may be
available on eBay
by George W.
Penington
First thing this morning an EBay alert was sent out by
E-mail..
Piece of the C.S.S Hunley. Described as
A 7 lb. Metal hunk of the Confederate States Ship H L Hunley was available to
EBay members with a starting bid of $25.00. Within the first hour there had been
over 75 visitors to see the mysterious part.
The seller,
dweezee831 ,
first comment this morning was that he didn’t realize what a stir this item
would bring up. He describes the part as follows “ This is a REAL piece cut off
of the ancient Confederate Submarine the C.S.S Hunley. It 7" long, 3" high and
weighs 7 lbs. This is your chance to have a piece of history that rivals musumes!
Certificate of Authenticity included. Please E-Mail me with any questions, or if
you want more info and pictures. Thanks! “
The seller stated that he had already received over 50
emails questioning the origin and authenticity of the part.

After posting notice of this item in the CSS H L Hunley
Club, things started moving. One of the members, Andy Hall, Marine
Archaeological Steward, Texas Historical Commission forwarded the notice to
Helen Correia of Guinn and Associates and Friends of the Hunley, Inc. “ Mr.
Pennington, Mr. Hall sent us, Friends of the Hunley, an email about the ebay
item from your website, and obviously we are now looking into it. As I thanked
him, he let me know it was you who pointed it out and he just passed it along.
So thank you to you too.
Sincerely,
Kellen Correia
Manager of Marketing and Public Relations

One of the first questions that
dweezee831 got
today was;
I am interested in this item. Can you give me history and
pictures behind this. How do I know it is real? May-31-05


Club member Tim Smalley quoted the seller
as saying;
“My father was a mechanical engineering professor at the
University of Nebraska-Lincoln. He was the head of many research-preservation
teams including the USS Arizona and the Hunley. He died of cancer in 2001. I
inherited 4 pieces of the Hunley. I was planning on making the certificate of
authenticity and having it notarized. However, since I have received over 50
E-mails in 5 hours from people expressing massive interest in the piece, I have
since called my lawyer. I am currently contacting former collueges of my fathers
to try to get a COA from someone who was there and is still involved with the
Hunley. I am considering taken the item off auction and putting back in the
safety vault at the bank until I can get a COA done with a professional and my
Lawyer. So that’s the story. I really didn't think it would spark this much
interest so fast, I will work my hardest to get this done right and get it back
up on auction. Thank You.”
Andy Hall did some quick research and came up with the
following:
That would be the late William Weins
(http://www.engr.unl.edu/me/faculty/william_weins/weins_scholarship.ht
m), who did indeed consult on both HUNLEY and ARIZONA. There are
several researchers at UNL that have been working closely with these
high-profile projects, doing a variety of metallurgical analyses.
Almost certainly, the father's possession of them was entirely legit,
and this link to the HUNLEY removes (in my mind) the suspicion of
nefarious doings associated with the eBay auction. I don't think
there's anything malicious going on here.
That said, I doubt the son should have these at all. I'm doubt these
iron samples were transferred to the father personally, but to the lab
with the understanding that they would be used for testing. Such
transfer arrangements usually specify that unused samples (i.e., not
destroyed in testing) be returned to the agency (FotH or the NHC). I
imagine that when Dr. Weins passed away, the folks at UNL probably
just packed up all his stuff and turned it over to the family. Bottom
line, I have my doubts whether these samples were Dr. Wein's personal
property to begin with, and most likely should not have been part of
his estate to be passed on to his heirs.-------------> AH
In the mean time Barry Rugoff from the club wrote the
seller; stating,
“Thanks for the reply! Please accept a friendly bit of
advice from
someone who has spent many years studying the Hunley:
If your artifacts are really from the H. L. Hunley, they're
priceless and may contain clues to one of the greatest historical
mysteries of all time. With all due respect to your father, they
should never have been removed from the boat and exposed to the air.
The right thing to do would be to donate them to the Friends of the
Hunley science team at the Warren Lasch Center in Charleston. The
Hunley science team can conserve them properly and will do a
complete archaeological analysis of them. Like the rest of the boat,
these pieces should be kept in a controlled underwater environment
in order to avoid the metal rusting away before the concretion on
the outside can be removed.
The recognition and gratitude you would receive in exchange would be
equally priceless. The Hunley will eventually be displayed in a
museum and your gift would be acknowledged and appreciated by
generations to come. You would achieve a bit of immortality.
However, I understand that you may consider the money that you can
get by selling these pieces to be your inheritance. That's not an
unreasonable point of view. You only inherit from your father once
in your life and I'm sure he would want to benefit from the things
he left behind. If that's the case, please consider selling them
directly to the Friends of the Hunley. If you choose to sell them
privately, please choose someone responsible who will do the right
thing with them. There are thousands of unethical and/or misguided
collectors of Civil War artifacts who will hoard them away and allow
them to disintegrate. That would be a real tragedy.
If I can be of any service to you with regard to information about
the Hunley or the people involved with it, please don't hesitate to
ask. Thanks very much, Barry
Barry continued to explain that he had been assuming that
the ownership of the items wasn't in doubt. Obviously, Dr. Wien's son has made
the same assumption, the legality of which will undoubtedly be questioned by the
FotH.
This may place dweezee831 in a difficult position because an eBay
auction is a legally binding contract. I'm not sure whether or not
he can cancel the auction once a bid has been made. George, you may
have to cancel your bid in order to get him off the hook. As of this
moment, it's the only one.
I'll send dweezee831 another email right away that advises him to
cancel the auction until the ownership issue is resolved.
By time we looked further into this after I placed my bid, I went back to EBay
to find that over 100 people had visited the auction and there were now three
bidders. Posted on the auction was the following question:, “Where these pieces
taken w/ the knowledge of the Hunley Commission and National Geographic Society?
Jun-01-05 By
this time things were obviously heating up for the seller. He answered by
stating that, “After doing some research of my
own, i now know that i cannot get a COA. Also the pieces are NOT the Hunley.
Anybody that bids WILL NOT be expected to PAY. DO NOT BID ON THIS!”
Ian Chafee footnoted the following policies from EBay:
http://pages.ebay.com/help/policies/user-agreement.html
Section 5:"Listing and Selling.
5.1 Listing Description. You must be legally able to sell the item(s) you list
for sale on the Site."
If it wasn't his to sell, he can't sell it. If he can't sell it, EBay handles
it like any other invalid auction, like the time that Jets fan tried to auction
off their field goal kicker because he missed a kick:
http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/story/272649p-233446c.html
Ø If it wasn't
his to sell, he can't sell it.
I'm sure the seller legitimately believes it's his property. And,
depending on what sort of arrangements/written agreements were made at
the time the samples were passed to his father, it may be difficult at
this point to prove otherwise. It's possible (though not likely, given
the prominence of the wreck) that there was no paperwork formally
setting out the terms of transfer of those samples. I have seen that
happen, too; there's simply a verbal agreement or "understanding" about
how the samples will be handled, without any formal documentation.
In any case, this is much more clearly a case of misunderstanding/poor
communication than of fraud or theft. Hopefully it can be resolved. AH
Tim Smalley <tmsmalley@yahoo.com> wrote: This just came up
on the site. Looks like things got a little too hot for the boy...
Q:Where these pieces taken w/ the knowledge of the Hunley Commission and
National Geographic Society?Jun-01-05A:After doing some research of my own, i
now know that i cannot get a COA. Also the pieces are NOT the Hunley. Anybody
that bids WILL NOT be expected to PAY. DO NOT BID ON THIS!
The fact that the seller suddenly states: "Also the pieces are NOT the Hunley"
in my opinion shows that he has suddenly panicked and wants to cover up the
facts too late. So he is damned if you do and damned if you don't. If he sticks
to the statement that they are not the Hunley, then he has attempted to commit
fraud through EBay or has he figured out that he can not get a Certificate of
Authenticity without exposing himself to the fact that he may be in possession
of stolen property. It has always been my opinion that every piece, parcel and
scrap of the Hunley belongs to us, the citizens and taxpayers down to the pluff
mud, research, pictures, artifacts and copyrights, and that we should be
allowed to enjoy, study and appreciate every scrap. The FOTH are the keepers and
protectors of these items. This man has already stated that he has consulted a
lawyer and it would probably be best if he invokes his right to remain silent. I
have always had suspicions that this may have been
happening and will not be surprised if more items show up in places that we do
not know about. It is like stolen artwork that stays in private collections for
the enjoyment of only a few until one day they finally show up. This seller's
father kept these artifacts in a vault until he died and either by greed or
ignorance he brought them out of hiding. GWP
Without limiting
any other remedies, eBay may suspend or terminate your account if we suspect
that you (by conviction, settlement, insurance or escrow investigation, or
otherwise) have engaged in fraudulent activity in connection with the Site.
-----
Original Message -----
From: mistergwp@bellsouth.net
To: Kellen Correia
Sent: Wednesday,
June 01, 2005 1:51 PM
Subject: Hunley
Parts - Ebay
Hello
Kellen; By now I guess you know that the auction of Hunley parts on eBay has
cancelled all bidding. I received the following notice.
"Dear
eBay Community Member,
The bid that you entered for the item (3978062220)
has been cancelled. You can view the reason provided for the cancellation by
selecting the (bid history) link from the individual item page.
Regards,
eBay “
I always suspected something like this may happen and wonder if there is any
more like it out there. The seller started back tracking suddenly on all his
claims which originally appeared very real.
Can you tell me what if anything your group may have done
and are there any plans to somehow retrieve these items. Thanks, George W.
Penington
Kellen
wrote back;
Hello
George,
Yes, you
can imagine that we have heard from a lot of people about this and we are
tracking it down. I appreciate you passing the information along.
Hope all is well with you.
Thank you,
Kellen
Sorry
George, I don't think I answered your question. Yes we are currently working on
getting to the bottom of this and retrieving the items.
Sincerely,
Kellen
When I
tried to investigate why the bidding was cancelled the only notice I got was:
Cancelled: Explanation: The seller ended the listing early and cancelled all
bids.
Dear mistergwp,
You asked:
"Do you know what piece this is, who will authenticate it, and How did it end
up in Nebraska? LOL Would like to include this info in my newsletter. George"
it ended up in nebraska, because UNL professors were in charge of researching
it. see e bay site.
When I went back to Ebay the following was posted:
The seller ended this listing early
because the item was lost or broken.
LINK:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3978062220&ssPageName=ADME:B:SS:US:1
In a letter from Brian Hicks of the Post and Courier he
states:
George,
Good to hear from you, and thanks for the email. I'm out of town but have
heard the rumblings of this auction halfway across the state.
I'm told by folks on the project that the pieces are not off the Hunley,
that the guy is confused, but I don't know all the details. Seems the
guy's dad was analyzing stuff from two or three projects (which is
referenced in the email you sent me). anyway, I think he's just mistaken.
I know how tight the scientists at the lab are and I don't believe they
have sent off any piece of sub, perhaps other than some drilled out rivets
to someone testing new conservation methods. And I may be remembering that
wrong.
Anyway, I'll let you know if I hear anything else.
Take care,
Brian
|
top
7) E. Lee SPENCE STILL IN SUIT over status as Hunley finder
|
|
 |
| Spence |
Cussler |
Plaintiff estimates credit in millions
By
Bruce Smith
The Associated Press
CHARLESTON - Underwater
archaeologist E. Lee Spence says he suffered
$309
million in damages because the discovery of the Confederate
submarine Hunley was credited to author
Clive Cussler.
The figure was
discussed during a deposition Spence gave as part of
the federal lawsuits
arising from the discovery of the Hunley a
decade ago.
"I want the
jury to award me everything they believe it has cost
me," Spence
said Wednesday. "I'm trying to be conservative in my
figures as to
what it cost me.
"I didn't
spend that much money and not that I would have received
that much
money, but I would have had that benefit."
The figure is
"absurd and I think it is ludicrous," said
John Lay
Jr., the attorney
representing Cussler.
Cussler recently was
granted a delay in the trial until at least
August because
he recently underwent open heart surgery and would be
unable to
travel for three months.
A group headed
by Cussler sued Spence in 2001.
That suit says
Spence's claim that he found the submarine injured
the reputation
of Cussler's National Underwater & Marine Agency and
divers Cussler
hired who have been credited by the S.C. Hunley
Commission
with finding the sub in 1995 off
Charleston.
Spence later
countersued, seeking damages and asking the court to
declare him the
discoverer of the Hunley, the first sub in history
to sink an
enemy warship.
Spence says he
discovered the sub in 1970.
His suit said
he filed documents in admiralty court in 1980 claiming
ownership and
published a chart in 1995 showing where it was.
The 40-foot,
hand-cranked Hunley rammed a spar with a black powder
charge into
the Union blockade ship
Housatonic, sinking the vessel
Feb. 17, 1864.
The Hunley sank as
well and was located in 1995.
It was raised five
years later and brought to a conservation lab at
the old
Charleston Naval Base, where it sits in a tank of chilled
water.
Spence, who
has been representing himself in court, said the damage
figure
includes $150 million in the ad value equivalent to the
publicity
Cussler has garnered by being credited with finding the
sub.
"If you figure
the TV time and all the newspaper and radio
[coverage]
that has said
Clive
Cussler recovered it, even though he
didn't
receive money for it, he received value for it," Spence said.
"I don't
think as a matter of law it's legally sustainable" to seek
damages for
such value, said Lay, adding that Cussler never profited
from the
Hunley. "Clive Cussler
had a substantial name before this
ever occurred.
"He has never given a speech specifically on the
Hunley."
Spence says
the damages include, among other things, lost speaking
engagements,
lost profits on his books and losing a contract to dive
for a treasure
wreck he researched and that subsequently was found.
He said it
does not necessarily mean he would have made $309 million.
"There is a
tremendous benefit to being the president of the
United
States although they don't pay you for that," Spence said.
top
|
8)
Interesting Book From The Law Book Exchange
1852 McCulloch, J.R. [1792-1864].
Vethake, Henry [1792-1866], Editor. A Dictionary, Practical, Theoretical,
and Historical, of Commerce and Commercial Navigation.
* Later American edition of a work first published in London
in 1832. The appendix has a title page listing
A.
Jones as the compiler and the imprint
New York:
Published by George H. Bell, 1852.
This copy may have belonged to the U.S.S. Canandaigua, which was involved in
the first successful submarine attack. An annotation on the rear free
endpaper of Volume I states "U.S. Sloop War "Canandaigua"/ Navy
Yard-Charlestown Mass. Sunday Nov 18th 1865/ Commander J.R. Goldsborough/
Vol Lt. E.J [illegible]/ Chief Engr Baliman." This may be the U.S.S.
Canandaigua that was involved in the sinking of the C.S.S. Hunley in
Charleston harbor in 1864. The Hunley was an early submarine that attacked
and sank the U.S.S. Housatonic. The Canandaigua
fired upon the surfaced Hunley, which may have caused it to sink.
(Historians debate the cause).
http://www.lawbookexchange.com/ |
|
|
9) HUNLEY
MODEL FROM A SUBSCRIBER
realname: Don Carpenter
username:
oldrebel75@netscape.com
city: Summerville
state: SC
country: USA
Date: Friday May 13, 2005
Time: 06:24:44 AM
comments
I enjoyed your site. I'm looking for details to built a realistic
model of the actual Hunley. I have a model built from W.A. Alexander's
1863 plans and already note, from your site and others, the many changes
that were made to produce the final Hunley.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 12:46 PM
Subject: Re: Guest Book Entry
Thanks for
writing Don,
Michael Crisafulli has an excellent
website, with drawings suitable for
developing a 3D models. See:http://home.att.net/~JVNautilus/Hunley.html
And high-resolution plans here:
http://home.att.net/~JVNautilus/Hunley/reconstruction.html
Check the sites out, if you need any other
help let me know. I am in Charleston and wouldn't mind seeing what you
have done so far..or you could send me some pictures to use in my next
newsletter. George W. Penington Webmaster and Editor of The Hunley.com
website and newsletter.
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.9 - Release Date: 5/12/2005
Dear George,
In regards to your e-mail of May 13, I've
attached 4 pics of my
model of the Hunley made from W.A. Alexander's sketches of 1863.
The quality of the pics are not that great as all I have is a low
resolution
digital pocket camera.
I made the model from scratch using kraft
paper, cardboard, wood,
plastic wood and wire for the steering rods. I included all the hardware:
seacocks, pumps, compass, manometer, etc. The crew figures are just
cutouts.
I hope to replace them with 3D figures. I scaled the model assuming the
height
inside to be 5 foot. This makes my model 1.2 cm = 1 foot. My model is
about 40 cm
long(15.75in) excluding the torpedo spar.
As we know now the "real" Hunley is quite
different from this original concept.
Thanks for the references you gave me. I plan to make a model of the
"real" Hunley, again from paper and cardboard. I would like to make
plans and or kits of these 2 versions of the Hunley and maybe sell them
a lot less than the resin models now on the market.
Thanks again for your help.
Sincerely, Don Carpenter
top
10)
How did the Hunley's ballast tanks work and how did she submerge?
Hunley ambient? and
ballast and dive plane operation.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 11:21 AM
Subject: Hunley ambient? and ballast and dive plane
operation.
Dear Webmaster for the official Hunley
submarine site.
I am a personal submarine owner. I am
also a member of Psubs.org,
a personal submarine owner web site and forum. We have been
discussing the Hunley and trying to figure out how she worked.
I am interested in how the Hunley's
ballast tanks worked as well
as how she submerged.
Would you please tell me if my below
description is correct
and if it is not, would you please explain to me how it is wrong.
My information is that the Hunley had
open top (bathtub style)
ballast tanks that were open to the hull interior. My information
is that the Hunley did not carry compressed air tanks.
From this I deduced that the Hunley had
all her air from the
surface trapped within her when she dove and could never lose any of
that air.
This would make the Hunley like an
upside down glass trying to
submerge without losing any air. The only way the Hunley could
submerge in my mind, would be for the Hunley to use her
forward motion and dive planes to force
her underwater, is this correct?
Then once underwater the superior water pressure would force water
into the opened valve of the open top ballast tanks and compress the
atmosphere
in the Hunley. Wouldn't this make the
Hunley an ambient submarine
as opposed to being a 1 atmosphere submarine?
Then when the Hunley wanted to accend
the crew would somehow
utilize the compressed atmosphere (how did they do that?) and a
pump,
to pump the water out of the ballast tanks and then the
atmosphere in the Hunley would
decompress and return to 1 atmosphere
and she would ascend. Is all the above of what I just wrote correct?
Also, has anyone done an analysis of how stable or unstable the
Hunley would be if she dropped
her keel weight to return to the
surface, and were there any indications
of that trying to be done inside the Hunley artifact?
I would appreciate if you could cover
all the above questions and
correct or confirm what I wrote so I can share them with my fellow
personal submarine owners at Psubs.com
Thanks very much. Sincerely,
Bill Akins.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 7:28 AM
Subject: Re: Hunley ambient? and ballast and dive plane
operation.
Dear Bill - Thanks for writing - I am
going to post your letter in our
club so that we can all discuss these interesting questions.
Feel free to join in we have alot of knowledgeable people,
experts,
engineers and rocket scientist and even a few trained monkeys.
You will have access to some of the best websites around for
information about the Hunley. My site by far is not the official
Hunley site.
The official site is
www.hunley.org Thanks for your interest,
hope you join us and stay in touch. George W. Penington
Webmaster and editor of the Hunley.com website and newsletter.
Club address:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/csshlhunley/
Thanks for responding George.Thanks also for supplying me
with the official Hunley site URL.Bill Akins.
Hello Bill - Here is
one of the responses we got to your email.
Thanks, George W. Penington Webmaster and Editor of
The Hunley.com website and newsletters.
top
11)
Michael Crisafulli ANSWERS
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 9:15 AM
Subject: [CSS H L HUNLEY] Re: Hunley ambient?
and ballast and dive plane operation.
First for George:
>Dear Webmaster for the official Hunley submarine site.
If only this were true.
Now for Bill:
>This would make the Hunley like an upside down glass trying to
>submerge without losing any air. The only way the Hunley could
>submerge in my mind, would be for the Hunley to use her
>forward motion and dive planes to force her underwater, is this
>correct?
It is likely that your interpretation
is correct. The volume of the
ballast tanks is very small compared to the entire interior. One of

William Alexander's 1902 drawings shows little difference between
waterlines with the tanks empty and full. The full waterline has
the hull submerged but most of the hatch towers out of the water.
Since this amounts to very little of the full volume of the
submarine, we can deduce it was designed to run with a slightly
positive buoyancy and used to planes to dive and stay submerged.
>Then once underwater the superior water pressure would
>force water into the opened valve of the open top ballast tanks and
>compress the atmosphere in the Hunley.
This is possible, but would require carefully timed and coordinated
activity to accomplish correctly and safely. The sub does have
complex piping between the tanks but not enough information has been
released for us to do more than speculate about its working. Once
again, there is very little volume in the tanks to work with so it's
unlikely there was much compression.
>Wouldn't this make the Hunley an ambient submarine as
>opposed to being a 1 atmosphere submarine?
>Then when the Hunley wanted to ascend the crew would somehow utilize
>the compressed atmosphere (how did they do that?) and a pump, to
pump
>the water out of the ballast tanks and then the atmosphere in the
Hunley would
>decompress and return to 1 atmosphere
>and she would ascend. Is all the above of what I just wrote correct?
Technically, with the open ballast tanks your characterization is
correct, but only to the point that the tank valves were closed. We
know they were closed (at some point) during normal underwater
operation because the second sinking, that cost Hunley his life was
attributed to his leaving the forward valve open. Pumps were used
to empty the tank, as far as we know, and any effect of a slightly
compressed atmosphere was likely only casual and not designed in.
>Also, has anyone done an analysis of how stable or unstable the
>Hunley would be if she dropped her keel weight to return to the
>surface, and were there any indications of that trying to be done
> inside the Hunley artifact?
This would be an interesting exercise. As far as we know, the three
(of seven) droppable weights were designed for emergencies, so
intent would only be to get to the surface. We can assume they
would have wanted to arrive there right side up. The four non-
droppable weights were probably there for that reason.
The official reports about the weights have been non-committal, but I
believe there was no attempt to release them because of the
positions of the handles. Read my analysis pop-up by clicking the
keel-ballast or keel-ballast icon near the top of my reconstruction
page:
http://home.att.net/~JVNautilus/Hunley/reconstruction.html
Michael
top
12) THE BATTLE OF SECESSIONVILLE - BOONE HALL
Hello Webmaster,
This morning I was
reading about the Civil War Reenactment.
We’re interested in The Battle of Secessionville. The page reads
“November 23rd & 24th”. These are a Wednesday and
a Thursday.
Later in the page is says “Battles at 3PM Saturday and 2PM Sunday.
In trying to plan our weekend, please clarify this for me. I truly
appreciate it.
Dee
Hello Dee: I have updated the information
on the
Battle of Seccessionville page. It is actually on the
19th and 20th this year.2005 George W. Penington
Webmaster and Editor of the Hunley.com website and newsletter.
These photos were taken at
the Battle
of Secessionville held on the grounds of Boone Hall Last Year .
|
April 1, 2005
Hours of operation change at the plantation.
Monday-Saturday 8:30-6:30
Sunday 1:00-5:00
November 19 and 20, 2005
9:00-5:00
|
 |
Photo's provided by:


13) E-MAIL AND GUEST BOOK SELECTIONS
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2005 9:27 AM
Subject: DAR program
PRESENTATION TO THE DAUGHTERS OF THE AMERICAN
REVOLUTION
George,
Just wanted to
touch base with you again to let you know we are looking forward to
your program on The Hunley on Wednesday, May 11, 2005 at the home of
Florrie Ervin at:
1102 Cherokee Road
Florence, SC
29501
Her home phone
number is (843)
I will be out of
my office on Monday afternoon and all day Tuesday for a meeting in
Charlotte, NC. Therefore please let me know if you have questions
by Monday morning. You can reach me by calling my office number
which I will forward to my mobile phone number. During my meeting
the phone will be cut off but you can leave a message.
Thank you. Lynn G.
Blackmon
Blackmon Paralegal
Services
Please send biographical information
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 7:53 AM
Subject: Re: DAR program
Present: Editor,
Publisher, reporter, photographer and writer
of THE HUNLEY.COM Newsletter - monthly newsletter
based on 
The Hunley Submarine History- Published 57 issues to date.
Webmaster, builder and designer of
www.thehunley.com website
- The Most Up
to Date Free Information Site on the WEB For
Non-Profit
Educational and Research Purposes.
Building Consultant - Developed and owned
Charleston4sale.com
– first dot com to offer virtual internet tours
and sales of real estate in Charleston, S.C.
Staff Engineer – Construction Coordinator Medical
University of S.C.
Owner – Building Consultants and Inspection
Services –
Division of Sample Engineering Company
Former Building Official City of Isle of Palms and
City of Sullivan’s Island, S.C.
Worked as a Real Estate Broker, in Sales and
Construction.
Worked for Congressman Arthur Ravenel, Jr. also
served with Sen. Glenn McConnell
as President of Sophomore Class – College of
Charleston -1969
Lifelong Charleston Resident
Married with one daughter
Enjoy Reading, Fishing, Civil War Naval History
Inventor – hold U.S. patent on a “Stair Climbing
Device”
Journalist and writer
Polio Survivor – One of the last to contract Polio in the 1954
Charleston Epidemic
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.5 - Release Date: 5/4/2005
|